Noise is an important parameter in image quality evaluation. Occurring as a random signal variation for each pixel, noise has its source in the physical characteristic of light (photon-shot noise) and technical limitations of the sensor (dark current and read noise).
A very common method to describe noise is to report it as the Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR). To measure the SNR of an imaging device, you can follow the ISO 15739 standard.
The higher the SNR, the less noise we find in the image.
This could be the end of the story, but unfortunately there is something that the SNR does not reflect very well:
How much noise does the observer actually see in the image?
We test digital cameras since 1997 and have used the SNR as a measurement for noise for a very long time. More than five years ago, we have seen the effect, that the results of the SNR measurement did not reflect the experience of the observer any more. So cameras got similar SNR values, but different appearance of noise. And the same appearance of noise, can result in different SNR values.
For this post, we prepared three sample images, 1x, 2x and 4x to illustrate the problem:



Imagine these images shall be uniform, but show some noise. If you go far away from your screen, you can see that all three images have the same mean value and look uniform.
If you are close to your screen, it is obvious that you can see more “noise” in image 4x than in image 1x.





